检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中南大学湘雅二医院医学心理中心
出 处:《中国临床心理学杂志》2008年第1期5-8,12,共5页Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
基 金:湖南省教育厅科学研究项目(B/19)14020742
摘 要:目的:检验4-6年级多重成就测验(MATs)的效度。方法:结构效度样本2002例,学科效标样本646例,能力倾向效标样本227例。结果:A、B本分量表和总量表专家评定符合度0.3以上,非常符合的条目分别82%和86%;A、B题本分量表和总量表与学科成绩相关0.23~0.60,与学业能力倾向测验相关0.39~0.66;探索性因素分析抽取2因素时为语、数因子,与分量表吻合,多个因子提取表明可能存在言语、记忆、数算、数形和数理五因子;不同学校和年级间存在显著性差异,语文分测验存在性别差异。结论:各种效度考验结果基本符合测量学的标准。Objectlve:To examine the validity of MATs of Grades 4-6. Methods: Constuctive validity sample consists of 2002 students. Results: The experts rating rank was above 0.3. 82% and 86% items were very good. The correlations between subscales and full scale and academic performances were from 0.23 to 0.60. The correlations between subscales and full scale and academic aptitude test were from 0.39 to 0.66. There were language and mathematics factors when 2 factors were extracted from 10 variables by exploratory factor analysis. When many factors were extracted there exist language knowledge, memory, mathematics computations, number and figure, and mathematics reasoning factors. Significant differences existed amount different schools and grades. Conclusion: Different validities tested in the MATs conform to the measurement standards.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28