检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张朝孝[1]
机构地区:[1]上海财经大学工商管理博士后流动站,上海200433
出 处:《山西财经大学学报》2008年第4期70-76,共7页Journal of Shanxi University of Finance and Economics
基 金:国家自然基金项目(70502028);河南省普通高等学校人文社会科学重点研究基地项目(XZ2006106)
摘 要:已有的研究倾向于将组织信誉缺失的原因归结为法制不完善、政府监管不力、地方保护主义等外部原因,而忽视了基于交易关系的微观机理分析。交易关系是现代经济活动的基本关系,任何组织都是由基于一系列委托代理关系的契约交易链条组成的。信誉缺失问题正是伴随内部及外部交易行为发生的。交易活动可以分为简单交易活动和复杂交易活动,后者信誉缺失的机理虽然在单个交易环节上与前者相似,但整体上与前者不同并且复杂得多。不同产权类型组织信誉缺失的原因在于治理结构及激励结构的差异,以及由此引起的内部交易中信誉问题向外部市场的传导,产权类型的差异不是信誉缺失的唯一原因。Fonner studies tend to ascribe the reputation losing of organizations to such as legal, regulation, local protection, and culture reasons, but reasons of microcosmic level based on transaction and on internal mechanism of organizations are ignored. Whereas, transactional relation is the basic relation in modem economic activities, and any organization can be multiplexed by transactional relation based on principal - agent relation. The problem of reputation loss just accompanies interior and exterior transactional activities. Transactional activities can be divided into simple transaction and complex transaction. Although at the single juncture the mechanism of the latter' s reputation lore and that of the former are similar, on the whole the mechanism of the latter is different from and more complex than that of the former. Difference between reasons of reputation loss of organizations with different property right types lies in difference of govemess structure and incentive structure, which rises to reputation problems of interior transaction to conduct to exterior markets, but is not the only reason of reputation less.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15