中国刑法与英美刑法紧急避险制度比较研究  

The Comparison of Necessity Between Chinese Criminal Law and Britain & American Crimncal Law

作　　者：鲁忠[1] 石来[1] 

机构地区：[1]苏州农业职业技术学院,江苏苏州215008

出　　处：《辽宁省交通高等专科学校学报》2008年第2期45-48,共4页Journal of Liaoning Provincial College of Communications

摘　　要：紧急避险是正当行为的一种。由于我国刑法与英美刑法理论中犯罪构成的不同,导致了各自紧急避险制度的不同。本文通过对我国刑法与英美刑法中关于紧急避险的法律性质、成立条件等的比较研究,笔者认为,英美刑法紧急避险制度对我国刑法理论与实践正确地处理紧急避险行为,都具有一定的借鉴价值。Necessity is a kind of justified behavior. The difference of criminal structure between Chinese Criminal law thevry and Brit- ain ＆ Americal criminal law theory results in the difference of each constitution of necessity. After the comparison of the nature and qualification of necessity between Chinese criminal law and Britain ＆ American criminal law, the author argues tha our criminal law theory and practive on necessity could draw lessons from those of Britain ＆ American Criminal law.

关 键 词：中国刑法 英美刑法 紧急避险 正当行为 

分 类 号：D914[政治法律—刑法学]