检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张光宇[1]
出 处:《福建警察学院学报》2008年第1期107-112,共6页Journal of Fujian Police College
摘 要:我国刑法分则体系经司法解释之后涌现出大量的选择性罪名,此举虽属无奈,但毕竟给司法实践带来了诸多不便。为此,有必要剖析其生成的原因或被选择的理由,以及其在客观上存在着哪些价值与不足,并寻找解决问题的办法。在尽可能减少产生选择性罪名的情况下,对那些不得不使用的选择性罪名,也要进行论证和提出必要的防范措施,从而终结不加限制地使用该罪名的法律历史,让刑法理性的光芒伴随着选择性罪名走完它的过渡时期。After the judicial interpretation to our country's criminal law, great numbers of optional ac-cusions have emerged, bringing much inconvenience to the judicial practice though helpless, Thus, it is necessary that the reason of its formation and being chosen be analyzed, and what values and limitations objectively exist discussed, to look for the ways to solve the problem. On condition that the optional accusion is reduced as much as possible, as to the optional accusion that has to utilized, the essential precau- tionary measures should be put forward and proved, ending the legal history of unlimitedly using the accusion, letting the optional accusion pass its transition period followed by the rational rays of criminal law.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.96