检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《贵州财经学院学报》2008年第3期1-5,共5页Journal of Guizhou College of Finance and Economics
基 金:国家社科基金项目"解决县乡财政困难研究"(项目号05CJY029)的阶段性成果
摘 要:近年以"撤并"为主要内容的乡镇政府改革被视为解决县乡财政困难的有效举措。为此,有必要就乡镇政府改革的三大问题进行辨析,即乡镇政府改革是撤并乡镇还是功能重构?是撤并乡镇以做大求规模效益还是注重小政府以求公共服务的质量责任和回应性?是对上(上级政府)负责的压力驱动型体制还是对下(本地居民)负责的需求导向型体制?以此来审视和反思当前我国的乡镇政府改革,结论是:"撤并式"乡镇政府改革效果有限。Reform of village and township government in recent years , with an emphasis on “removal and merger” , has been considered an effective means to resolve financial difficulties at county and village level. With this regard , the author analyses three issues in the reform: Is the reform removal and merger of villages and towns or function restructuring? Should we remove or merge them to achieve economies of scale , or focus on small government to seek accountability and respon- siveness of public services? Is it a pressure - pushing system accountable to higher - level government or a needs - often- ted system accountable to local residents? This paper rethinks the current reform of village and township government from these perspectives and concludes that the “removal and merger” reform has only achieved limited results.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.142.237.71