国产与进口喹硫平治疗精神分裂症对照研究  

A control study of domestic vs.import quetiapine in the treatment of schizophrenia

作　　者：张蓉[1] 赖玉兰[1] 

机构地区：[1]惠州市第二人民医院,广东惠州516000

出　　处：《临床心身疾病杂志》2008年第3期208-210,共3页Journal of Clinical Psychosomatic Diseases

摘　　要：目的比较国产与进口喹硫平治疗精神分裂症的临床疗效及安全性。方法将60例精神分裂症患者随机分为两组各30例,研究组口服国产喹硫平治疗,对照组口服进口喹硫平治疗,观察8w。于治疗前及治疗1w、8w末采用阳性与阴性症状量表评定临床疗效,副反应量表评定不良反应。结果治疗8w末,研究组显效率80.0%、总有效率96.7%;对照组分别为76.7%和100%,两组显效率、总有效率比较差异均无显著性(χ2=0.981、1.017,P>0.05)。阳性与阴性症状量表评分,两组治疗第1w末起总分均较治疗前有显著性下降(P均<0.01),治疗8w末,总分及各因子分均显著低于治疗前(P均<0.01)。两组不良反应均轻微,主要为轻度头昏、低血压、食欲减退等。结论国产喹硫平治疗精神分裂症的疗效、起效时间、安全性、依从性与进口喹硫平相当。Objective To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of domestic vs. import quetiapine in schizophrenia. Methods Sixty schizophrenivs were randomly divided into research（n= 30）orally took domestic quetiapine and control group（n= 30）did import quetiapine for 8 weeks. Clinical efficacies were assessed with the Emergent Symp excellence and t Positive and Negative Symptom Scale（PANSS） and adverse reactions with the Treatment tom otal control group respectively,which showed no significant difference（P〉0.05）. Since the end of week 1, total scores of the PANSS of both groups lowered much more significantly（both P〈0.01）,total and each factor score were very significantly lower at the end of week 8 compared with pretreatment（all P〈0.01） . Adverse reactions of both groups were mild and mainly mild dizziness, hypotension, anorexia and so on. Conelussion Domestic quetiapine is significantly effective,takes effects quicker,has higher safety and better compliance, is equivalent to import quetiapine and may be clinically extended as first-line atypical antipsychotant.

关 键 词：精神分裂症 喹硫平 国产 进口 疗效 安全性 

分 类 号：R749.3[医药卫生—神经病学与精神病学]