司法判案中的隐性知识及其意义  

On Judicial Tacit Knowledge and Its Significance

作　　者：胡学军[1] 涂书田[1] 

机构地区：[1]南昌大学法学院,江西南昌330047

出　　处：《法学论坛》2008年第3期78-82,共5页Legal Forum

摘　　要：作为现代认识论的重要课题的隐性知识论对司法判案的认识过程有着现实指导意义,法官在司法判案的事实审理过程中也存在着隐性知识的运用。我国法学领域长期信奉的"客观真实"论语境及法官缺乏对知识发现的信心,内外两方面的原因促成并加剧了个人司法实践知识的"内隐性"。认识和显现法官在案件判断过程中的隐性知识有助于我国司法改革的进行及法学学科的发达。Tacit knowledge of modem epistemology as an important subject for judicial recognition process has realistic guiding significance, the judges decide cases in the judicial proceedings that there are also a tacit knowledge is used. China＇ s long- term believer in the field of law ＂objectivity reality＂ On Context and the judge found that the lack of knowledge of confidence, both inside and outside contributed to the reasons for the increased personal and judicial practice knowledge ＂ tacit.＂ Understanding and judges appear judgment in the case in the process of tacit knowledge contribute to the reform of China＇ s judicial and law disciplines developed.

关 键 词：司法 隐性知识 意义 

分 类 号：D915[政治法律—诉讼法学]