辽、金、元科举制比较研究  

Comparative Studies on the Keju System in Liao,Jin and Yuan Dynasties

作　　者：刘希伟[1] 

机构地区：[1]厦门大学教育研究院,福建厦门361005

出　　处：《中国地质大学学报（社会科学版）》2008年第3期76-80,共5页Journal of China University of Geosciences(Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目(03JZD0038)

摘　　要：通过断代间的比较研究可以发现,辽、金、元三代在对科举功能认同度、科举程序、所设科目与内容及登科人数上存在着相当的差异;三代的学校教育普遍受到了科举制的影响。在"民族"这一维度上,三代科举制虽各具独特的民族色彩,但实际上更多地表现出某种共通性:辽代虽最终"面向汉藩",但主要"面向汉人"的政策显示出了契丹人自身尤其是其统治者长期不屑科举的一面;金、元两代直接凸显出了强烈的民族歧视。辽、金、元三代科举制的比较研究具有一定的必要性,同时也具有一定的研究价值。The comparative analysis finds that the Keju system in Liao, Jin and Yuan Dynasties had many differences in the following aspects： the recognition of the functions of Keju, its procedure and contents and the number of the matriculated. Schooling education was apparently influenced by Keju in three dynasties. Three dynasties had much in common. In Liao Dynasty Keju was ＂open only for the Han nationality＂, and in Jin and Yuan Dynasties it showed strong ethnic discrimination. The comparative studies on the Keju system in Liao, Jin and Yuan Dynasties are necessary and have important theoretical meanings.

关 键 词：辽 金 元 科举制 比较研究 

分 类 号：G691.3[文化科学—教育学]