六朝“清绮”辨析  

The Discrimination of the "Qingqi" in the Six Dynasties

作　　者：冀秀美[1] 

机构地区：[1]保定学院中文系,河北保定071002

出　　处：《河北大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2008年第3期89-93,共5页Journal of Hebei University(Philosophy and Social Science)

摘　　要：六朝是文学不断走向自觉的时代,文学理论空前繁荣,因此有大量的文论范畴产生,其中不少频繁出现在六朝文人笔下,其内涵多变而复杂,"清绮"就是其中之一。首先,"清绮"在文学风格论的领域,因与"清"相关联,其产生和发展不仅反映了文学本身的发展规律,而且较为充分地体现了中国古代文论深厚的哲学基础。其次,它和中国古代文论的其他范畴一样,随着社会的发展,尤其当文学在不同时代产生不同思潮及表现不同审美倾向时,其意义也在不断地丰富或变迁。更重要的是"清绮"在六朝文论中极具代表性,为此,微观地用"以意逆志"的方式将它区别于"绮靡"、"轻绮"等几个相近的范畴,对认识六朝文学及相关作家作品的共性与个性有十分重要的意义。The Six Dynasties is a special time when literature began to awaken. The literature theory developed rapidly and relative concepts sprang up and were used quite often at that time. Many of them were very complex and changeable. One of them was ＂Qingqi＂. This notion is associated with ＂Qing＂ and its development reflected the developing rule of the literature, and also embodied the profound philosophy of Chinese ancient literature. Just like other concepts, its meaning developed with the development of the society. Most important of all, ＂Qingqi＂ was very representative among the Six Dynasties literature works. The author differentiates it from other words such as ＂Qimi＂ and ＂Qingqi＂, which is very meaningful for understanding the literature in the Six Dynasties and the characters and commonness of relative authors.

关 键 词：六朝 清 清绮 绮靡 轻绮 

分 类 号：I044[文学—文学理论]