检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:朱景文[1]
出 处:《中国社会科学》2008年第3期79-94,共16页Social Sciences in China
基 金:“中国法律发展报告--数据库和指标体系”课题;教育部重大攻关课题“多元化纠纷解决机制与和谐社会的建构”(05JZD0004).
摘 要:改革开放以来,中国诉讼数量迅速增长,但1997年以后诉讼增长率明显降低。对于社会转型期诉讼增长率不升反降的原因,可以从非诉讼纠纷解决机制、司法政策和法院公信力三个方面来分析纠纷的走向。关于诉讼与非诉讼纠纷解决机制的年均增长率、相关系数和比重的数据分析表明,中国诉讼增长率的下降也伴随着人民调解和经济仲裁作用的下降,行政解决机制的增强、不受理的司法政策、诉讼费用改革以及针对司法腐败的一系列制度性建设,遏制了诉讼量的快速增长。Following reform and opening up,China witnessed a rapid increase in litigation,but the rate of increase has undergone a marked decline since 1997.The reasons this has occurred in a period of social transformation are threefold:a non-litigious dispute-solving mechanism,judicial policy and the credibility of the courts.A data analysis of the average annual rate of increase,the coefficient of correlation,and the respective proportions of litigious and non-litigious dispute-solving mechanisms indicates that the slowing of the rate of increase of litigation has been accompanied by a decrease in the role of the people's mediation and economic arbitration.The rapid increase of lawsuits has been curbed by enhancement of the administrative dispute-solving mechanism,a non-acceptance judicial policy,the reform of legal fees and a series of institution-building measures targeting judicial corruption.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.219.197.162