论科学证据的三大基本理论问题  

On the Three Basic Theoretical Issues of Scientific Evidence

作　　者：张斌[1] 

机构地区：[1]四川大学法学院

出　　处：《证据科学》2008年第2期138-146,共9页Evidence Science

基　　金：国家社科基金项目"科学证据采信基本原理研究"(编号:05CFX018)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：科学证据可以定义为运用具有可检验特征的普遍定理、规律和原理,解释案件事实构成的变化发展及其内在联系的专家意见,其主要理由在于可以科学原理在科学证据生成过程中所起的作用与功能,将科学证据分为"科学描述型"与"科学检验型"两类,"科学描述型"不是典型意义上的科学证据。从定位来看,科学证据应属于言词证据、间接证据。可以按照不同的标准对科学证据进行分类,以此加深对科学证据的认识。Scientific evidence may be essentially defined as expert opinions which explain case facts and their inter-relationships by using generally accepted theories, rules and principles. Scientific evidence may be divided into two classes, descriptive and analytical, according to function. Descriptive scientific evidence is not real scientific evidence. Scientific evidence belongs in oral evidence and indirect evidence. Understanding of scientific evidence may be furthered by the classification of it under different standards.

关 键 词：科学证据 概念 定位 分类 

分 类 号：D915.13[政治法律—诉讼法学]