检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:丁颖[1]
出 处:《江苏社会科学》2008年第3期107-112,共6页Jiangsu Social Sciences
摘 要:与诉讼相比,仲裁有其自身独特的优越性,基于这种优势,支持仲裁的理念正在成为共识;而契约自由原则通常能够最大限度的发挥仲裁的优越性并贯彻支持仲裁的政策。一种实用主义思维进路为我们解决诸如仲裁性质的定位、原则与政策关系的平衡等问题提供了新的启示。A variety of problems in present commercial arbitration system of China originate mainly from lack of correct idea supporting the system. Answers to how to realize the advantages of arbitration and develop them are the keys to those problems. Due to the advantages of resolving disputes through arbitration, the idea of favoring arbitration is becoming a common view. And in general, insisting on the principle of freedom of contract can develop arbitration-s advantages best and is conducive to the implementation of the policy favoring arbitration. The foregoing analysis reflects a pragmatistic approach. That pragmatistic ap- proach provides us with new inspiration about such issues as the nature of arbitration, the relationship between principle and policy, etc. and perhaps makes many problems nagging us not problems any longer.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117