流浪与非流浪精神分裂症患者社会因素的比较分析  

To compare with the social factors differences of wandering schrizophrenia patients and non-wandering schrizophrenia patients

作　　者：方亚明[1] 刘彦颖[1] 邱友胜[1] 高欢[1] 

机构地区：[1]广东省深圳市康宁医院,广东深圳518020

出　　处：《中国民康医学》2008年第11期1179-1180,共2页Medical Journal of Chinese People’s Health

基　　金：深圳市科技局立项:"深圳市住院流浪精神病人现状调查研究"(2005148)

摘　　要：目的:比较分析流浪精神分裂症和非流浪精神分裂症患者的社会因素的差异。方法:对200例流浪精神分裂症患者和200例非流浪精神分裂症患者的社会因素用自编《流浪精神病人调查表》进行比较分析。结果:流浪精神分裂症患者组中以外省及邻近市县、未婚、无业者居多,精神病复发、110警察送入、毁物伤人、言行紊乱显著性高于非流浪精神分裂症患者组(P<0.01);流浪精神分裂症患者出院方式以救助站和自动出院为主。结论:流浪精神分裂症患者的社会因素与非流浪精神病患者有明显差异,需有针对性地做好城市流浪精神病患者防治工作。Objective：To compare with the social factors differences of wandering schrizophrenia patients and non -wandering schrizophrenia patients. Methods ：Self- made questionnaire was applied to compare and analysis the social factors of 200 wandering schrizophrenia patients and 200 non - wandering schrizophrenia patients. Results ： Wandering schrizophrenia patients gave majority to the unmarried ,out -of- work laborers, the man of outer provinces and neighborhood counties. The odds of relapse psychosis ,posted in hospital by 110 police.the man who hurt people and destroy goods, works and deeds disorder of the wandering schrizophrenia patients group were significantly higher than those of the non - wandering schrizophrenia patients group（ P 〈 0.01 ）. The discharging hospital way of most wandering schrizophrenia patients is to go to the rescue unit and to leave hospital by themselives. Conclusions ： There is significantly difference in the stoical factors between wandering schrizophrenia patients and non - wandering schrizophrenia patients. We need to deal with the preventive and cue work of the city wandering schrizophrenia patients accordingly.

关 键 词：流浪 精神分裂症 社会因素 比较分析 

分 类 号：R749.3[医药卫生—神经病学与精神病学]