检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]北京大学人口研究所,北京100871 [2]中山大学地理科学与规划学院,广东广州510275
出 处:《人口与发展》2008年第3期37-46,共10页Population and Development
基 金:国家统计局的资助;北京大学“985”和“211”工程的支持
摘 要:利用2005年全国1%人口抽样调查数据,分析了我国东南部十一个省份就业者基于户籍制度的收入差异。户口类型对于工资的影响可以被不同户口类型人群的教育回报差距所解释。不同户口类型人群间教育回报的差距随着教育年限的下降而显著扩大。这一结果支持了在解释基于户籍制度的工资歧视的合理性方面信息经济学的有关理论。我国城乡间义务教育水平的差距引起了基于户籍制度的教育回报差异,进而导致了基于户籍类型的工资歧视。Based on eleven provinces of the 2005 1% National Population Sample Survey (NPSS) dataset in southeast China, this paper analyzes the role of returns to education in wage discrimination against people with agricultural hukou. We find that different returns to education explain the effect of hukou types on wage disparity. Further, assisted by a spline regression model, the gap of returns to education is found to enlarge as years of schooling decrease and reaches its peak in primary education. These findings confirm the theory of information economics, rather than prejudice, as a way to explain wage discrimination against rural immigrants. Finally, this paper points out that the quality of compulsory education should be responsible for the different returns of education based on household registration system, which engenders the wage discrimination against people with agricultural hukou.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30