检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]电子科技大学经济与管理学院,四川成都610064
出 处:《系统工程学报》2008年第3期302-308,共7页Journal of Systems Engineering
基 金:中国博士后科学基金资助项目(20060391028)
摘 要:在供应链的价值分配的研究中,引入了混合博弈和价值分配偏好的方法.探讨在制造商垄断、多个供应商处于竞争关系的情况下,制造商对供应商的选择与制造商在供应链中的价值分配偏好之间的关系.对于特殊情况,供应商的数量越大和供应量的差异越小,制造商获取供应链价值分配的偏好越大.对于一般情况,引入"竞争差值"和"竞争剩余"来刻画影响制造商价值分配的本质因素,供应商的竞争剩余之和减去供应竞争差值放大的值越小,制造商获取供应链价值分配的偏好越大.In the research of value distribution of supply chain, hybrid game and value-distribution preference methods are introduced. This paper studies the relationship between the supplier selection and value-distribution preference of manufacturer when the manufacture is a monopolist and suppliers are in competitive condition. For a special case, the more the number of suppliers is and the less the difference of supply quantities are, the more value-distribution preference of the monopolistic manufacture is. For general cases, both parameters the competitive difference and the competitive residual are selected to depict the essential factors which influence the manufacturer' s value-distribution. The less the difference between the sum of suppliers' competitive residual and the amplification of competitive difference is, the more the value-distribution preference of the manufacturer is .
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.63