中医康复法与上田法治疗痉挛型双瘫脑瘫患儿疗效的对比研究  

Comparison of Acupuncture and Massage to Ueda Test on Children with Spastic Diplegia

作　　者：范艳萍[1] 许洪伟[1] 赵发文[1] 张丽华 

机构地区：[1]佳木斯大学附属第三医院,黑龙江省小儿脑性瘫痪防治疗育中心,黑龙江佳木斯市154003 [2]北京市康复中心,北京市100144

出　　处：《中国康复理论与实践》2008年第6期562-563,共2页Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice

基　　金：佳木斯大学科研项目(NoS52)

摘　　要：目的比较中医康复法与上田法治疗痉挛型双瘫脑瘫患儿肌张力、扩大踝关节被动关节活动度的临床疗效。方法在常规治疗的基础上,试验组30例患儿采用中医康复法治疗,对照组30例患儿采用上田法治疗。结果治疗后,两组患儿的肌张力、踝关节被动关节活动度与治疗前比较差异均有显著性意义(P<0.05),但试验组的治疗有效率高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论中医康复法降低肌张力、扩大踝关节被动关节活动度的效果优于上田法。Objective To compare the effects of acupuncture and massage and Ueda test on spasticity and passive ankle-joint range of motion of children with spastic diplegia. Methods Based on conventional treatment, thirty children of the experimental group were treated with acupuncture and massage, and that of the control group were treated with Ueda test. Results After treatment, the spasticity and passive ankle-joint range of motion of children in the experimental group and control group all improved （ P〈0.05）. The therapeutic effect of the experimental group was superior to that of the control group （P〈0.05）. Conclusion The effect of acupunc- ture and massage is better than Ueda test in decreasing muscular tension.

关 键 词：痉挛型双瘫 康复 上田法 疗效 

分 类 号：R742.3[医药卫生—神经病学与精神病学]