检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《石河子大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2008年第3期26-30,共5页Journal of Shihezi University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
摘 要:我国现行《刑事诉讼法》赋予了被害人当事人地位和公诉人的非当事人地位,而这从程序意义当事人的角度来看,均不具有合理性。它们都是实体法地位在诉讼中的延伸,而根本没有考虑他们在刑事诉讼中承担的诉讼职能。正是由于公诉人的非当事人化地位,才使得被害人升格为当事人。从程序意义上来看,应当废除被害人的当事人地位,赋予公诉人当事人地位,但公诉人的当事人化不是绝对的。The current "Criminal Procedure prosecutor non-litigant status. However, it is Law "entrusts with the victim the litigant status, and endows the public not reasonable from the point of procedural sense of litigant. They are only the extension of the status of substantive law in criminal proceedings. People utterly do not consider their functions of action in the criminal prosecution. It is precisely because of the prosecutor's non-litigant status, which upgrades the victim to a litigant. Looking from the procedural sense , we must abolish victim' s litigant status and entrust with the public prosecutor the litigant status. But the ligigant of public prosecutor is not absolute.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.79