检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:林甲宜[1] 杜桂兰[1] 顾东方[1] 李友红[1] 曾兴霞
机构地区:[1]安徽省九成医院,安庆246220
出 处:《临床神经病学杂志》2008年第3期221-223,共3页Journal of Clinical Neurology
摘 要:目的探讨加巴喷丁(GBP)添加治疗对难治性癫癎局灶性发作的疗效以及对记忆功能的影响。方法96例难治性局灶性发作癫癎患者随机分为两组,在原用药物基础上,GBP组给予GBP添加治疗,托吡酯(TPM)组给予TPM添加治疗;添加治疗前后应用临床记忆量表(CMS)对入组者进行记忆功能评估及疗效评估。结果添加治疗20周GBP组总有效率(75.0%)与TPM组(72.9%)相比差异无统计学意义;与添加治疗前比较,添加治疗后GBP组CMS评分差异无统计学意义;TPM组无意义图形再认、自由图像回忆、人像特点回忆和记忆商显著下降(均P<0.05)。结论GBP作为添加药物治疗难治性癫癎局灶性发作有效,对患者记忆功能无明显不良影响。Objective To study the curative effect and influence on memory function of Gabapentin (GBP) as add-on therapy for treatment of focal seizures in refractory epilepsy. Methods 96 patients with focal seizures in refractory epilepsy were randomly divided into groups GBP and Topiramate (TPM). Beside the normal medicaments, GBP or TPM as add-on therapy for certain group. According to the Clinical Memory Scale (CMS) , the patient's memory function was evaluated before and after treatment. Results There was no significantly difference of total effective rate between groups GBP (75.0%) and TPM (72.9%). The scores of CMS showed almost same between before or after add-on therapy in GBP group. In TPM group, the scores of meaningless image recognition, free recall, phase portrait characteristics and memory quotient were significantly reduced after add TPM ( all P 〈 0. 05 ). Conclusions GBP as add-on therapy for treatment of focal seizures in refractory epilepsy is effective and safety, and it is no visible negative influence on memory function.
分 类 号:R742.1[医药卫生—神经病学与精神病学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.57