先秦子书与伍子胥故事  

Stories and Assessment of Wu Zixu in the Essays by the Great Thinkers before Qin

作　　者：陈洪[1] 姚瑶[1] 

机构地区：[1]徐州师范大学文学院,江苏徐州221116

出　　处：《徐州师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2008年第4期23-27,共5页Journal of Xuzhou Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：教育部人文社科项目<出土文献与先秦两汉小说史研究>(05JA750.11-44029)成果之一;江苏省高校社科基金项目(05SJB750003)。

摘　　要：伍子胥作为春秋时代的风云人物,曾引起战国时期史学家和思想家的广泛注意和深刻思考,其故事不仅见录于先秦史籍,而且也见载于诸子著作。与史家记载不同的是,《韩非子》、《吕氏春秋》给伍子胥故事增加了一些新的情节和人物,这不仅丰富了伍子胥故事,而且也使这一历史故事的小说意味愈加浓厚;《荀子》、《庄子》等对于伍子胥形象虽然大多只是简短的点评,并不讲述故事,但都对伍子胥的品格给予了道德评判,形成了伍子胥忠贤、强谏的人物形象。这些引述和评价具有三方面的意义:在思想内容上促使伍子胥的忠臣形象成为后来故事发展的内在灵魂;在表现形式上,推动了伍子胥故事的小说化和文学传播,显示出子书向小说转变的趋向;在文体上,则体现了中国早期小说的某些重要特征,如譬喻故事加议论的叙述模式。As a man in the Spring and Autumn Period, Wu Zixu was attracted extensive attention and profound thinking from historians and thinkers in the Warring States Period, the stories appeared in some historical documents before Qin and also in the essays hy the essayists as well. Han Feizi and Lv Shi Chun Qiu added some new plots and characters to Wu Zixu stories. Xun Zi and Zhuang Zi gave moral assessment to Wu＇s character and built the figure of loyalty and uprightness. These citations and assessments were meaningful in two aspects： in the ideological content, they promoted the loyal figure of Wu Zixu to the inner soul of the latter improvement of the story ; in the outside expression, they impelled the novelization and literary dissemination of the story, implying the transforming tendency from essays to novels.

关 键 词：伍子胥故事 先秦诸子 道德评判 小说化 文学传播 

分 类 号：I207.41[文学—中国文学]