严格证明新论——兼议我国的刑事证据立法  

A New Probing into Strict Testification——On Legislation of Criminal Evidence in China

作　　者：何邦武[1] 

机构地区：[1]浙江理工大学法政学院,浙江杭州310018

出　　处：《西南农业大学学报（社会科学版）》2008年第3期43-46,共4页Journal of Southwest Agricultural University:Social Science Edition

摘　　要：比较而言,两大法系在解决诉讼的证据资格问题上各有特色,然而,学界在对大陆法系刑事诉讼中有关严格证明这一关涉证据资格问题的理解上,将其仅解读为对实体法事实证明力的要求,而对其在证据能力即证据方法和证据调查程序上的要求语焉不详,造成严格证明概念的片面化和空洞化,这与学界传统上对大陆法系关于刑事证据能力问题上的误读有关。认真梳理大陆法系刑事证据资格的理论,不仅是重新认识大陆法系刑事诉讼原理及其证据制度的要求,也是解决当下中国刑事证据立法知识准备不足的必由之路。Comparatively speaking, there are different evidence qualities in the two major legal families： the English-American legal family and the continental legal family. But in our evidence theory, we usually think the strict testification of the continental legal family as a requirement of testification value for entity facts only, yet are unclear as to its demand on evidence qualities. The main reason lles in our misunderstanding of the continent legal family＇s regulations in evidence qualities. So the continent legal family＇s theory on evidence qualities must be reconsidered, and it is also the only road to solve the inadequacies in our evidence legislation.

关 键 词：严格证明 证据方法 证据调查程序 

分 类 号：D915.13[政治法律—诉讼法学] D920.0[政治法律—法学]