检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]四川省彭州市人民医院外二科,四川彭州611930 [2]四川省都江堰市水电十局医院外二科,四川都江堰611830 [3]四川大学华西医院胸心血管外科,四川成都610041
出 处:《临床和实验医学杂志》2008年第7期5-6,共2页Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine
基 金:国家自然科学基金(30100181);四川大学青年科技基金(2003035)
摘 要:目的从卫生经济学的角度探讨食管胃机械吻合与三叶钳食管胃分层吻合的治疗的成本和效果。方法290例患者接受食管癌根治术,根据食管胃吻合方式的不同,分为手工吻合组和机械吻合组,应用成本-效果分析法进行回顾性分析。结果食管癌采用三叶钳辅助食管胃分层吻合组医疗成本明显低于机械吻合组,而效果两组差异无显著性。结论食管癌采用三叶钳辅助食管胃分层吻合组医疗成本低,是减少一次性医疗器械的使用的有效方法之一,值得临床推广应用。Objective To investigate the therapeutic cost and effect of esophago - gastroanastomosis by mechanical inosculation or by delaminating inosculatinn with three leaf clamp from point view of medical economics. Methods 290 patients accepted radical operation for esophageal carcinoma were divided into hand - made inosculation group and mechanical inosculation group according to different styles of esophago - gastroanaslomosis, then the cost - effectiveness was retrospectively analyzed by using analytical method. Results The medical Cost for esophago - gastroanastomosis by delaminating inosculation with three leaf clamp was obviously lower than that of mechanical inesculation group, and there was no significant difference in therapeutic effect in both groups. Conclusion The medical therapeutic cost in group of esophago - gastroanastomosis by delaminating inesculation with three leaf clamp group is lower than that of group with mechanical inosculation for treatment of esophageal carcinoma. There is no significant difference between both groups.
关 键 词:三叶钳辅助食管胃分层吻合 机械吻合 成本 效果
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49