中美两国研究型大学本科教育改革之比较  

Comparative research on reform of undergraduate education in research universities between America and China

作　　者：庄丽君[1] 刘少雪[1] 

机构地区：[1]上海交通大学高等教育研究所,上海200240

出　　处：《高等教育研究》2008年第6期70-76,共7页Journal of Higher Education

基　　金：全国教育科学"十一五"规划2006年度教育部重点课题(DIA060157);上海市2007年度教育科学研究项目(B07051)

摘　　要：本科教育是大学教育的主体,是奠定高层次人才后续教育和终身发展的关键时期,如何发挥研究型大学特有的师资、设备、学科专业和生源优势,提供优质的本科教育是一个非常值得思考和研究的问题。本文以"博耶报告"的10条建议为参照,以"博耶3年后报告"和我国14所研究型大学的本科教学工作水平评估自评报告为依据,对两国研究型大学本科教育的改革现状进行比较,分析和诊断了研究型大学本科教学中存在的问题,提出了未来研究型大学本科教育改革的趋势,以期给我国研究型大学的本科教育教学改革以理论和实践启示。Undergraduate education is the principal part of higher education, and is the key period to lay the foundation for sustainable and lifelong development of people. It is worth discussing and studying how to exert peculiar advantages of research universities to provide an excellent undergraduate education, such as the advantages of faculty, facilities, majors and students. From the angle of ten suggestions put in the report of Reinventing Undergraduate Education： A Blueprint for America＇s Research Universities, the article is to compare the reform of undergraduate education in research universities between America and China on the basis of Reinventing Undergraduate Education：Three Years After the Boyer Report and the undergraduate quality self-evaluation report of Chinese research universities. In order to provide theoratical and practical implication for research universities of China, it analyses and diagnoses the problems in the reform of undergraduate education of the two countries and predicts the trend of undergraduate education reform in the future.

关 键 词：研究型大学 本科教学 改革 

分 类 号：G642.0[文化科学—高等教育学]