检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国医科大学附属第一医院呼吸疾病研究所,沈阳110001 [2]中国医科大学附属第四医院内科
出 处:《中华医学教育杂志》2008年第2期62-64,共3页Chinese Journal of Medical Education
基 金:美国中华医学基金会“中国北方医学教育发展中心课程开发子项目”(CMB#03-793)
摘 要:目的探讨以问题为基础学习(problem—basedlearning,PBL)教学方法的效果。方法选择我校2001级七年制临床医学专业58名学生为研究对象,分为实验组和对照组。教学内容为内科学中的支气管哮喘疾病。实验组28名学生,采用PBL教学方法;对照组30名学生,采用传统教学方法。对两组学生在授课前后就有关哮喘疾病知识进行问卷调查,并比较两组学生期末考试成绩。结果哮喘疾病知识问卷调查学生得分情况:授课前实验组学生得分明显优于对照组学生(P〈0.05),授课后两组学生得分无明显统计学差异(P〉0.05);授课后两组学生得分明显优于授课前(P〈0.05)。期末考试病例试题成绩,实验组学生优于对照组学生(P〈0.05)。结论两种授课方法均能提高医学生对哮喘疾病知识的掌握,但是PBL教学方法可以增强医学生对临床病例的远期综合分析能力。Objective To approach a problem-based learning method for teaching asthma and as- sess its teaching effect. Methods 58 medical students take part in the test. They are divided into two groups in PBL group and non-PBL group respectively. The 28 students in PBL group are taught by PBL method. The 30 students in non-PBL group received the traditional teaching method. Before and after the both classes, we prepare a questionnaires on asthma for the two groups, also the scores of final examination are compared as well. Results As to the scores of questionnaires, the students in PBL group are signifi- cantly higher than the other one before class ( P 〈 0. 05 ), but there are no difference after class ( P 〉 0. 05 ) ; the scores after class are gotten significantly higher than that before class in both groups ( P 〈 0.05 ). In the final examination, the scores of the students in PBL group are much better than non-PBL group on the case analysis. Conclusions Both of the two teaching methods could help students to master the key points of asthma. PBL method might enhance students' ability on case analysis in the long-term effectiveness.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145