检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:莫晓东[1] 江志伟[1] 汪志明[1] 赵鑫[1] 刁艳青[1] 何长生[1]
机构地区:[1]南京大学医学院临床学院(南京军区南京总医院)解放军普通外科研究所,江苏南京210002
出 处:《肠外与肠内营养》2008年第4期218-220,224,共4页Parenteral & Enteral Nutrition
基 金:江苏省社会发展基金资助课题(07Z028)
摘 要:目的:对胃癌病人应用加速康复外科(FTS)方案进行对照研究。方法:选取胃癌病人100例,50例应用常规治疗方案作为对照组,50例应用FTS方案为FTS组,比较两组病人的住院时间,住院费用和并发症。结果:FTS组病人住院时间为(12.4±3.3)d,与对照组[(16.2±3.2)d]比较有非常显著差异(P<0.01)。两组病人的术前天数无显著性差异(P=0.282)。FTS组病人术后天数(6.6±3.0)d,较对照组(10.6±2.8)d明显缩短(P<0.01)。FTS组平均住院费用(21 420±3 733)元,低于对照组(24 991±4 408)元(P<0.01)。两组并发症比较无明显差异(P>0.05)。结论:通过围手术期FTS方案治疗,胃癌病人术后康复加快,住院时间,特别是术后住院时间缩短,医疗费用下降。Objective: The study on therapeutic efficiency and costs between fast track surgery (FTS) programme and regular programme was carried out gastric cancer patients. Methods:100 gastric cancer patients were selected to treat with conventional therapy as control group or to treat with fast track surgery programme. The hospital stay, preoperative hospital stay, postoperative hospital stay,hospitalization expenditure, and complication were compared between the 2 groups. Results: There was a significant difference(P〈0.01) in hospital stay between FTS group [(12.4± 3.3 )d ] and control group [(16.2±3.2)d]. Postoperative stay was obviously shortened in FTS group compared to control group [(6.6±3.0) d vs (10.6±2.8) d ,P〈0.01]. Hospitalization expenditure in FTS group was lower than that in control group. The complication was not significantly different between the two groups. Conclusion:FTS treatment can accelerated postoperative rehabilitation and elevate clinical efficiency in patients.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.73