检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:袁咏红[1]
出 处:《史学月刊》2008年第7期70-75,共6页Journal of Historical Science
摘 要:对于1930年代因"读经"而引发的争论,仅从政治思想斗争及国民党寻求统治的合法性而展开研究是不够的。争论的背景和相关论述表明,它更主要是立足于民族和文化的双重危机;立足于对传统文化与现实政治、社会生活、文化建设等相关联系的多种认识。It is not enough to study the debate on reading classics in the 1930s only from the viewpoint of political struggle by KMT to seek the legitimacy of rule. The discussion about the debate background in this paper makes it clear that the debate was based mainly on national and cultural crisis, and on different understandings to such aspects as the relationship between traditional culture and realistic politics, society life, and cultural construction.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145