检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]河南省人民医院老年医学部消化病区,郑州450003
出 处:《中国临床药理学杂志》2008年第4期361-363,共3页The Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
摘 要:目的探讨三联疗法(质子泵抑制剂+阿莫西林+克拉霉素)根除幽门螺杆菌(HP)治疗失败后的补救方案。方法将95名HP感染且三联疗法根除HP治疗失败的患者,随机分为试验组与对照组,并分别用新三联法(质子泵抑制剂+阿莫西林+左氧氟沙星)与四联法(质子泵抑制剂+铋剂+四环素+甲硝唑)比较,在治疗结束时和结束后4周,检测HP,并评价耐受性。结果在HP根除率和耐受性,试验组优于对照组。结论以左氧氟沙星为基础的新三联方案是有效的补救方案,优于四联方案。Objective To investigate the rescue regimens after failed of Helicobacter pylori (HP)eradication with standard triple therapy. Methotis Ninety-five patients who infected HP with triple therapy (PPI + amoxicillin + clarithromycin)failed were random devided into trial group ( PPI + levofloxacin + amoxicillin) and control group ( quadruple therapy) ,then the rate of HP eradication was evaluated, the adverce reaction was evaluated after the end of treatment . Results Trial group was better than control group in rate of HP eradication, trial group was less than control group in adverse reaction. Conclusion After HP eradication failure, levofloxacin-based rescue regimen is more effective and tolerated better than the generally recommended quadruple therapy.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.116.85.79