论我国民事诉讼第三人制度之完善  

On the perfection of third person system in China's civil litigation system

作　　者：杨翠萍[1] 

机构地区：[1]辽宁公安司法管理干部学院,辽宁沈阳110031

出　　处：《辽宁公安司法管理干部学院学报》2008年第3期59-62,共4页Journal of Liaoning Administrators College of Police and Justice

摘　　要：民事诉讼第三人制度由于具有保护第三人的合法权益、实现诉讼经济、防止裁判矛盾的功能,因而为当今世界许多国家所采用。我国民事诉讼立法对第三人的规定极为简单,缺少防止诈害诉讼的第三人,使第三人制度的内在功能受到了限制;无独立请求权第三人存在着诉讼地位矛盾和不确定、诉讼权利受到限制、参加诉讼方式和被判决承担民事责任有悖法理等缺陷。作为一种程序制度,过分追求诉讼经济、忽视对第三人的诉讼权利保护是问题产生的根源。鉴于上述原因,本文在保留原第三人诉讼概念的基础上,结合理论界对第三人制度的研究成果,提出了实体和程序的双重标准,将第三人分为四种类型,并对各个类型分别加以论述,力求使之简明并且合理。The third person system in civil litigation is adopted by many countries around the world today, because the system can protect the legitimate fights and interests of a third person, achieve economic litigation and prevent the magistrate contradictory. China＇s civil legislation on the provisions of a third person is extremely simple, the lack of action to prevent harm bluff the third person to third person the inherent function of the system was limited and no independent right to request a third person there is a contradictory position of litigation and uncertainty And litigation rights were restricted, to participate in litigation and the judgment was contrary to bear civil liability and other legal deficiencies. As a system of procedures, the pursuit of litigation over the economy, neglect of a third person to protect the fight of action is the root of the problem. For these reasons, on the basis of retaining the original concept of a third person, the paper proposed double standards of entity and procedures, divided third person into four types to be discussed, and strived to make it simple and reasonable.

关 键 词：诉讼欺诈 利害关系 独立请求权 参诉方式 准独立第三人 

分 类 号：D925.1[政治法律—诉讼法学]