检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《中国现代医生》2008年第22期63-64,共2页China Modern Doctor
摘 要:目的研究发病7~12h脑梗死患者溶栓治疗的安全性及有效性。方法通过对发病7~12h和发病小于6h脑梗死患者溶栓治疗对比,对发病7~12h脑梗死患者溶栓和非溶栓治疗组疗效对比。结果6h内溶栓治疗组有效率80.5%,无效11%,加重8.3%7~12h溶栓治疗组有效率61.1%,无效16.6%,加重22.2%。一般治疗组有效率19.2%,无效率23%,恶化30.7%。结论发病7~12h脑梗死患者溶栓治疗安全有效值得推广。Objective To research the security and the effect of venous thrombolytic therapy in 27 cerebral infarction patients in pathogenesis of 7 to 12 hours. Methods The thromholytic therapy between patients in pathogenesis of 7 to 12 hours and those within 6 hours,the effect between thronholytic therapy and common therapy in infarction patients in pathogenesis of 7 to 12 hours were compared. Results In the thrombolytic therapy group within 6 hours,the effective rate was 80.5% ,invalid rate was 11%,worsen rate was 8.3%,in the group 7 to 12 hours,the effective rate was 61.1%,uneffective rate was 16.6%,worsen rate was 22.2%,common therapy group,the effective rate was 19.2%,uneffective rate was 23%,worsen rate was 30.7%. Conclusion Thronbolytic therapy is secure and effective in infarction patients in pathogenesis of 7 to 12 hours and it is worthy to be extended.
分 类 号:R743.33[医药卫生—神经病学与精神病学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.15.189.231