检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:黄志忠[1]
出 处:《美中经济评论》2008年第6期11-18,27,共9页Meizhong Jingji Pinglun
基 金:本文系国家自然科学基金项目(项目编号:70602026)和广东省自然科学基金(项目编号:06300974)资助项目.
摘 要:本文以2004年在沪深股市交易的1172个A股非金融上市公司为样本,将样本分别按第一大股东持股比例、所有权性质和独立董事占董事会成员比例分咸3组、2组和3组,共组成18个组合,先後考察了股权集中和私有制封大股东侵占的治理效果,在第一大股东持股比例与股权性质没有差异的情况下独立董事的治理效果。研究发现私有制并没有提高、也没有降低大股东侵占的概率;股权集中则在一定程度上降低了大股东侵占的概率;国有企业的独立董事比例与大股东侵占概率负相关;当私有产权控股股东持股比例较低时,独立董事比例的提高有利于降低大股东侵占的概率。This paper uses a sample of 1172 non-financial listed firms in 2004 to examine the impacts of independent directors on the tunneling of large shareholders, by dividing the sample into 6 groups in which the stake held by the largest shareholder is not different between 3 layers of percentage of independent directors in the board. We find that privatization is not helpful to reduce the probability of tunneling, and ownership concentration reduces large shareholders' tunneling, and when the listed firms are controlled by government or SOE, or the rates of share held by private owners are lower, then the percentage of independent directors in board is negatively related to the probability of expropriation carded out by large shareholders.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222