情绪调节策略对推理的影响  

Effects of Emotional Regulation Strategies on Reasoning

作　　者：张敏[1] 卢家楣[1] 谭贤政[1] 王力[2] 

机构地区：[1]上海师范大学教育学院 [2]华南师范大学心理应用研究中心,广州510631

出　　处：《心理科学》2008年第4期805-808,813,共5页Journal of Psychological Science

基　　金：全国教育科学“十一五”规划教育部重点项目(DBA060093);上海市教育委员会重点学科建设项目(项目编号J50403);安徽省教育厅人文社科项目(2007SK283)

摘　　要：研究使用两种推理题作为实验材料,比较了负性情绪诱发状态下情绪调节策略使用与否以及不同情绪调节策略对推理的影响。结果发现,认知重评组的成绩好于表达抑制组和无调节组,存在显著差异;表达抑制组与无调节组之间不存在差异。此外,在表达抑制组上,男生的图形推理成绩好于女生,存在显著的性别差异。因此,个体不同推理任务的成绩与是否使用调节策略、使用什么策略及性别有关。Two reasoning topics were used to compare the effects of whether or not using strategies of emotional regulation were used and the different strategies of emotional regulation on reasoning under the condition of negative emotion. We found that the reasoning results Of using the cognitive reappraisal strategy were better than those of using the expression suppression strategy and using no strategie~ the difference between them was remarkable but no remarkable difference was found between using the expression suppression strategy and using no strategy in the reasoning results. In addition, there were some remarkable gender differences in figure reasoning tasks when the expression suppression strategy was used. Boys＇ reasoning results were better than those of girls＇. Therefore, individual reasoning results are related to whether or not strategies of emotion regulation are used, what strategies are used and what gender is involved.

关 键 词：情绪调节策略 认知重评 表达抑制 言语推理 图形推理 

分 类 号：B842.6[哲学宗教—基础心理学]