检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:戴妍[1]
机构地区:[1]西华师范大学教育科学与技术学院,四川南充637009
出 处:《西华师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2008年第4期104-107,共4页Journal of China West Normal University:Philosophy & Social Sciences
基 金:四川省教育发展研究中心资助项目(川教函[2006]486号)
摘 要:通过使用亲密关系体验问卷和症状自评量表(SCL-90)对215名大学生进行了调查,探讨了大学生依恋类型与其心理健康之间的关系。研究表明大学生依恋类型与其心理健康之间有密切关系。其中专注型男女在躯体化、抑郁、焦虑、偏执、精神病性和其他因素上存在显著差异,冷漠型男女只在抑郁上存在显著差异;只有恐惧型恋爱与没有恋爱在人际关系、敌对、精神病性和其他因素上存在显著差异;安全型与不安全型只有在躯体化水平上差异不显著,在其他各水平上均达到显著。The paper has researched the relationship between the types of attachment and psychological health of college students who by investigating 215 college students who are assessed in types of attachment and psychological health. The assessment included experiences in close relationships inventory (ECR) and SCL- 90 for college students. The research shows that there is close correlation between types of attachment and psychological health of college students. Among all, there is a significant difference in somatization, depression, anxiety, paranoia, mental illness and other factors both on preoccupied men and women, but dismissing men and women only have significant differences in depression. Only love and fear-no love in relationships, hostility, mental illness and other factors have some significant differences. Secure and insecurity in the level of somatization have no significant difference but in all other levels achieve notable difference.
分 类 号:B844.3[哲学宗教—发展与教育心理学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229