检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《现代临床医学》2008年第4期279-280,共2页Journal of Modern Clinical Medicine
摘 要:目的:比较乳腺癌术后两种镇痛方法的效果与不良反应。方法:将拟行择期乳癌根治术的60例病人随机分成罗哌卡因硬膜外镇痛组(PCEA组,n=30)和芬太尼静脉镇痛组(PCIA组,n=30)两组。PCEA组采用0.1%罗哌卡因(含芬太尼2μg.mL-1),PCIA组采用0.001%芬太尼加0.005%氟哌利多,比较观察术后镇痛镇静效果及不良反应。结果:术后镇痛效果两组比较无显著性差异(P>0.05),术后不良反应PCIA明显多于PCEA(P<0.05)。结论:用于乳癌术后镇痛0.1%罗哌卡因硬膜外镇痛优于芬太尼静脉镇痛。Objective: To compare the analgesic efficacy and side effects of different methods of analgesic alter mastectomy. Methods: Sixty ASA Ⅰ - Ⅱ patients undergoing radical operation for brest cancer were randomly divided into two groups: 0. 1% ropivacaine (containing fentanyl 2 μg·mL^-1) epidural analgesia (PCEA) group ( n = 30). 0. 001% fentanyl with 0. 005 % droperidol controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) group (n = 30). The postoperative analgesia efficacy and sedation efficacy and side- effects after operation were observed. Results: There was no obvious difference between the two groups about the effect of postoperative analgesia ( P 〉 0.05 ). The side - effects were significantly more in group PCIA than those in group PCEA(P 〈0.05). Conclusion: The method of epidural analgesia with 0. 1% ropivacaine is much better and more effective than the method of intravenous analgesia with fentanyl.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.11