检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吴国英[1] 章颖[1] 袁桂兰[1] 吕华[1] 冯志娟[1] 金玲[1]
机构地区:[1]北京市海淀医院妇产科,100080
出 处:《中国计划生育学杂志》2008年第7期428-430,共3页Chinese Journal of Family Planning
摘 要:目的:比较开腹、阴式、腹腔镜下3种途径子宫肌瘤剔除术的优缺点。方法:回顾分析开腹子宫肌瘤剔除术42例(开腹组)、阴道子宫肌瘤剔除术26例(阴式组)和腹腔镜下子宫肌瘤剔除术25例(腹腔镜组)的临床资料。结果:阴道组手术时间最短(84.2±29.8min),开腹组次之(102.7±30.8min),腹腔镜组手术时间最长(129.6±39.7min),3组间比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术中出血量阴式组最少(122.3±44.1ml),与开腹组、腹腔镜组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。肌瘤最大直径开腹组最大(8.0±2.8cm),与腹腔镜组、阴式组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后排气时间阴式组最短(21.0±4.8h),腹腔镜组次之(24.4±5.1h),开腹组时间最长(30.5±4.7h),3组间比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后病率3组间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后住院时间开腹组时间最长(7.5±1.1d),与阴式组、腹腔镜组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:腹腔镜下子宫肌瘤剔除术、阴式子宫肌瘤剔除术具有手术创伤小、术后恢复快等优点,而开腹子宫肌瘤剔除术适应证范围更广,3种术式不能完全互相替代。Objective: To compare the advantages and disadvantages of transabdominal myomectomy (TAM), transvaginal myomectomy(TVM) and laparoscopic myomectomy(LM). Methods: The clinical data of 42 cases of TAM (group TAM), 26 cases of TVM ( group TVM) and 25 cases of LM ( group LM ) were retrospectively reviewed. Results : The operation time of the group TVM was the shortest (84.2min ±29.8min), the group TAM occupied longer time than the group TVM( 102.7min ±30.8min ), and the group LM occupied the longest time ( 129.6min ± 39.7min). There were significant differences among the three groups (P 〈0.05). The intraoperation hemorrhage volume was significantly less in the group TVM( 122.3 ±44.1 ) mL than that in the group TAM and the group LM ( P 〈 0.05 ). About the longest diameter of the myomas, the group TAM was arranged the first place( 8.0 ± 2.8) cm which was significantly longer than the that of the other two groups. About the time of gas passage by anus, the group TVM occupied the shortest time(21.0 ± 4.8)h, the group LM occupied longer time than the group TVM ( 24.4 ± 5.1 ) h, and the TAM occupied the longest time ( 30.5 ± 4.7 ) h. There was significant differences among the three groups ( P 〈 0.05 ). As to the post - operative morbidity, there was no statistical difference. The length of stay of the group TAM (7.5 ± 1.1 ) d was significantly longer than that of the other two groups. Conclusion: Both LM and TVM have advantages of micro - invasion and rapid recovery, but TAM has a great variety of indications, which could not entirely supersede each other.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222