高等教育学费定价的论争及启示  

The Debate about Higher Education Tuition Pricing and Its Enlightenments

作　　者：胡茂波[1] 沈红[1] 

机构地区：[1]华中科技大学教育科学研究院,武汉430074

出　　处：《教育发展研究》2008年第13期16-20,共5页Research in Educational Development

基　　金：全国教育科学规划教育部重点课题"国家助学贷款实施效益评价"(DFA050089)研究成果之一

摘　　要：高等教育学费有"成本分担说"和"价格说"两种观点,由此也产生了"政府定价"与"市场定价"的论争。主张"政府定价"的学者认为,高等教育学费定价应基于"获利原则"和"能力支付原则";主张市场定价的学者认为,高等教育学费定价应基于"社会福利效应最大化"。本文结合学者们的论争,对我国高等教育学费制订的主体、依据、监管等进行梳理和分析。There are two attribute on higher education tuition. Some people emphasize ＂Cost Share＂. and the other people emphasize ＂Price＂. So. there has a controversy over the tuition pricing between government and market. The scholars holding government pricing bring forward ＂Profit Principle＂ and ＂Capacity to Pay Principle＂. The scholars holding market pricing put forth ＂Maximization of Social Welfare＂. It is unanimously agreed that the cost of higher education and the fiscal policy could impact on higher education tuition pricing by scholars. But there are some different views to the affection of the capacity of students and family＇s paying, the relation of supplying and demanding, the rate of personal income. There has a controversy between ＂uniform pricing＂ and ＂differential pricing＂ over the way of tuition pricing. It is a significant enlightenment to the factors, and the management of higher education tuition pricing.

关 键 词：高等教育学费 成本分担说 价格说 

分 类 号：G647.5[文化科学—高等教育学]