信用卡诈骗罪司法认定研究述评  

Research and Description about Judicial Determination of Credit Card Fraud

作　　者：陈若男[1] 

机构地区：[1]厦门大学法学院,福建厦门361005

出　　处：《莆田学院学报》2008年第3期6-10,共5页Journal of putian University

摘　　要：2005年我国通过《刑法修正案(五)》后,信用卡诈骗罪又成为学界研究热点,对于信用卡诈骗罪和盗窃信用卡并使用行为的性质和司法认定存有较大争议。对信用卡诈骗罪的司法认定,持实质的解释论,考察刑法用语的真实含义,用实质的、正义的标准界定构成要件的内涵与外延。认为盗窃信用卡并在自动柜员机使用的行为,只构成一般盗窃罪,而不构成盗窃金融机构罪。After The 5th revision of Criminal Law was passed in 2005, the research of credit card crime became a hot topic in the academia. There arc still many controversies in the nature and determination of credit card fraud and judicial determination of burgling credit card and using. We hold the substantive explanation theory, judicial determination about credit card fraud, inspection criminal law terminology real meaning. After that, with substantive, justice standard defining the elements constitute connotation and extension. The behaviors of burgling credit card and using only constitute the common crime of theft, while financial institution is not the true object of crime.

关 键 词：信用卡 诈骗罪 司法认定 刑法 

分 类 号：D922.284[政治法律—经济法学]