检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:谢思静[1] 郭斌[2] 赵铁耘[3] 阙克华[4] 杨帆[4] 刘静[4]
机构地区:[1]南京大学附属口腔医院,医师江苏210093 [2]四川大学华西口腔医学院老年口腔医学教研室,主任副教授四川610041 [3]四川大学华西医院内分泌科,副教授四川610041 [4]四川大学华西口腔医学院,博士生四川610041
出 处:《中华老年口腔医学杂志》2008年第3期129-131,共3页Chinese Journal of Geriatric Dentistry
基 金:四川省科技厅科技攻关项目资助(05SG022-019-4);四川省科技厅重点科技攻关项目(2007SGY024)资助
摘 要:目的:比较2型糖尿病老年患者及正常老年人患龋状况,探讨龋病与糖尿病关系,以指导对老年糖尿病患者口腔疾病的预防和治疗。方法:随机筛选四川大学华西医院内分泌科住院部2型糖尿病老年患者82例(糖尿病组),与其年龄、性别相应的健康老年人82例(对照组),临床检查并记录龋失补牙数(DMFT)、简化软垢指数(DI-S)。结果:糖尿病组龋失补牙数与对照组无明显差异(P>0.05),但是简化软垢指数大于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:2型糖尿病老年患者与健康老年人患龋状况无明显差异,但其口腔卫生状况较健康老年人差,患龋风险性增大。应当重视对糖尿病患者的口腔保健宣传教育。Objective: The aim of this study was to compare and analyse the incidence of caries in the diabetic and the healthy elders. Methods: The study comprised randomly sampled 82 type 2 diabetic aged inpatients from West China Hospital of Sichuan University (diabetic group), 82 age and gender-matched healthy aged people (control group). Clinical examinations were performed, and DMFT, DI-S index was recorded. Results: There were no significant differences in DMFT between the diabetic and control group (P〉0.05). The diabetic group had statistically higher DI-S index than the control (P〈0.05). Conclusions: It should be taken into account to guide and improve the aged diabetic patients' general and oral health.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.227