试论我国的物权行为制度——结合我国新物权法  

On China's System of Property Rights——With China's New Property Law

作　　者：郭泽峰[1] 

机构地区：[1]周口师范学院政法系,河南周口466001

出　　处：《黑龙江教育学院学报》2008年第9期13-16,共4页Journal of Heilongjiang College of Education

摘　　要：我国物权立法是否采用物权行为制度不应仅受制于理论的逻辑,尚需应有实用的考虑。基于此,新物权法在借鉴各国立法例的基础上,采纳了物权行为理论的区分原则,但并未完全采用德国法上的物权行为理论。在物权变动上,不仅需要作为物权变动原因的合同债权行为,还需要交付或登记的结合,即所谓的债权形式主义立法例。同时考虑到特殊性,例外采用意思主义,以登记或交付作为对抗要件。从总体上着眼,这种立法是比较符合我国国情的。China＇s property rights legislation of whether adopt the system of property rights should not be solely by the logic of theory, it will need practical considerations. Based on this, it leams from the national legislation and accepts theory of property rights of the principle of distinction, but not entirely accepts the Germen＇s theory. Changes in property rights, it not only needs as a reason for the change of contract, it is also necessary that delivery or registered, the so-called claims of formalism legislation. Taking into account the specificity, with the exception of the use of means, register or delivery is used for a hedge against the elements. On the whole, this legislation is more in line with China＇s actual conditions.

关 键 词：物权行为 物权合意 债权合意 物权变动 债权形式主义 

分 类 号：D913[政治法律—民商法学]