检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]哈尔滨医科大学口腔医学院,黑龙江哈尔滨150001
出 处:《牙体牙髓牙周病学杂志》2008年第8期443-445,共3页Chinese Journal of Conservative Dentistry
摘 要:目的:通过比较自酸蚀黏结剂和全酸蚀黏结剂,在流动复合体窝沟封闭中的边缘封闭性和保留率,评价自酸蚀黏结剂在窝沟封闭中应用的效果。方法:选取离体第三恒磨牙40个,采用Dyractflow流动复合体做窝沟封闭材料,分为两组,分别用自酸蚀黏结剂和全酸蚀黏结剂进行封闭处理,体视显微镜下观察封闭剂边缘的微渗漏情况;临床对85名7~10岁小学生采取自身双侧对照研究方法,均采用Dyractflow流动复合体做窝沟封闭材料,随机选择一侧上、下颌第一恒磨牙作为实验组,采用XenoⅢ自酸蚀黏结剂进行窝沟封闭;对侧同名牙作为对照组,采用全酸蚀黏结剂。在第1、2年进行临床观察比较。结果:两种黏结剂均存在微渗漏现象,黏结剂之间的微漏程度无显著性差异(P〉0.05);临床1、2年保存率均无显著性差异(P〉0.05)。结论:自酸蚀黏结剂在流动复合体窝沟封闭中具有较好的临床治疗效果。AIM : To evaluate the efficacy of self etch adhesives in Light cure Dyract flow on the pit and fissure sealant technique. METHODS: Forty eight extracted third molars were selected and divided into two groups randomly and treated with Xeno Ⅲ , Prime&BondNT seperately then restored with Light cure Dyract flow. The first permanent molars with total 340 in 85 children from 7 year to 10 year old were divided into 2 groups randomly. Dyractflow flowable compomer restorative was used as pit and fissure sealant. The experimental group was treated with self etching bonding(Xeno Ⅲ ), and the control group with total - etching adhesive (Prime&BondNT). All children were followed up for one year and two years. RESULTS : Microleakage was present in two groups. No statistical difference was shown. There was no statistical difference between the two adhesives in the retention of 1 -2 year. CONCLUSION: Self etch adhesives in Light cure Dyract flow for the Pit and fissure sealant technique has good clinical effect.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.218.189.170