委托理财案件审理的司法成本问题探析  

Analysis of the Judicial Costs in Hearing of the Cases of Entrust Finance

作　　者：康锐[1] 

机构地区：[1]上海海事大学法学院,上海200135

出　　处：《上海财经大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2008年第4期38-45,共8页Journal of Shanghai University of Finance and Economics

基　　金：上海市重点学科(第二期)项目(T0604)

摘　　要：本文在率先发现委托理财案件存在着司法成本以及该成本持续上升状况的同时,从全新角度解说了这一现状的成因正是法律的确定性不清所引起的法律关系混淆。我国《信托法》没有很好地发挥信托信号机制的积极作用,通过信托信号区分信托关系与代理等其他法律关系的区别,因而导致委托理财关系法律性质难以认定,并催生出保底条款这一畸形做法,给法院审理案件带来困难并进一步加大了司法解释出台的难度。The judicial costs in hearing the cases of entrust finance can be resulted from some factors. Taking the lead in discovering the existence of judicial costs in hearing the cases of entrust finance and the constant growth of such costs as well, this paper explains that the reason for these phenomena is the mixing up of legal relationships resulted from the inexplicitly of the predictability of the laws. The Trust Law of China fails to take advantages of trust signal mechanism and to distinguish the trust relationship from agency or other legal relationship through the trust signal. Hence it leads to the difficulties in determining the legal nature of the entrust finance relationship and brings on the malformed practice of ＂Fixed Profit＂ clause which has intensified further the difficulty of court hearing as well as the inauguration of the judicial interpretation.

关 键 词：委托理财 保底条款 信托 委托代理 

分 类 号：D922.282[政治法律—经济法学]