检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《天津市政法管理干部学院学报》2008年第3期8-12,共5页Journal of Tianjin Administrative Institute of Political Science & Law
摘 要:公益诉讼裁判法律效果的实现及其延伸是公益诉讼制度设计和实践运作的难点问题,本文区分群体性、个体公益性诉讼的不同模式,分别从既判力主观扩张、预决事实拘束力、判例效力和判决执行力四个方面架构公益诉讼裁判的效力体系,充分论证公益诉讼裁判效力延伸的可能性和正当性,并结合我国司法实践提出可行性操作方案,以实现公益诉讼有效维护社会整体公共利益的价值预设。Legal effect and its extension of public interest litigation judgment are the difficult problems in design and operation of public interest litigation system. The paper is to distinguish different modes of group and individual public interest litigation. The system of effectiveness of public interest litigation judgment is structured from such four aspects as subjective extension of res judicata, binding force of pre-definition fact, case law's effectiveness and enforcement of judgment. And the possibility and legitimacy of legal effect and its extension of public interest litigation judgment are fully demonstrated. Combined with China's judicial practice, the feasible operation scheme is proposed to achieve public interest litigation, and effectively protect the value hypothesis of whole public interest of society.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145