检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:黄达鸿[1] 林天赐[1] 张建明[1] 王海涛[1] 张恒俊[1]
机构地区:[1]佛山科学技术学院附属口腔医院,广东佛山528000
出 处:《佛山科学技术学院学报(自然科学版)》2008年第4期39-42,共4页Journal of Foshan University(Natural Science Edition)
基 金:广东省医学科学技术研究基金项目(WSJJ20051010440102196407163210)
摘 要:目的观察磁性附着体义齿修复游离缺失磨牙的临床效果。方法对10例单侧游离缺失磨牙和5例双侧游离缺失磨牙的患者先进行卡环式活动义齿修复,测定其固位力、咀嚼效率和体积,再进行磁性附着体义齿修复,测定固位力、咀嚼效率和体积,对前后两组数据进行比较分析。结果磁性附着体义齿修复游离缺失磨牙具有足够的固位力,比卡环式义齿咀嚼效率提高10%~20%,体积减少25%~40%。具有统计学意义。结论磁性附着体义齿修复游离缺失磨牙效果美观、舒适、咀嚼效能高,是一种较好的修复方法。Objective To observe the applied effect of molar extensive partial dentures with magnetic attachmets. Methods Traditional partial dentures with claps were used for 10 patients with one side molars extensive losed and 5 patients with two sides molars losed first. Measured the vertical retentive force, the chewing efficiency and Physical volume of the dentures. Then partial dentures with magnetic attachmets were used for all the patients and measured. Results The distal extensive partial dentures with magnetic attachments has enough retentive force, comparing the traditional partial dentures the chewing efficiency of the partial dentures with magnetic attachmets increase 10% -20% and and the Physical volume of the partial dentures with magnetic attachmets reduce 25-40%. Conclusion The distal extensive partial dentures with magnetic attachments were compact, aesthetic and comfortable: the dentures could supply reliable retention, stability and highly chewing efficiency.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30