检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:肖仕明[1] 姜淮芜[1] 吴宸[1] 欧荣册[1] 陈进[1] 肖琳[1]
机构地区:[1]川北医学院附属第二医院普外二科,四川绵阳621000
出 处:《中国普外基础与临床杂志》2008年第9期682-685,689,共5页Chinese Journal of Bases and Clinics In General Surgery
基 金:四川省卫生厅科学研究项目(编号:020095)~~
摘 要:目的探讨近端胃癌根治术后合理的消化道重建方式。方法回顾性总结2004年6月至2007年1月期间我院行近端胃癌次全胃切除连续病例59例,依据重建方式分为2组:胃食管侧端吻合重建组(GE组)和调节型双通道间置空肠重建组(GIE组),GIE组重建在残胃与食管间增加一段长35cm的连续性间置空肠,对比分析2组术后患者生活质量状况。结果全组病例无围手术期死亡、吻合口漏、倾倒综合征及中度以上贫血病例发生。术后1和6个月体重、RBC、Hb、Alb、PNI值以及其相对于术前的变化值〔术后1个月RBC(P=0.006)、Hb(P=0.001)相对于术前的变化值除外〕,GIE组和GE组间差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。GIE组术后腹部症状和反流性食管炎症状的Visick评分优于GE组(P<0.001):GIE组主要为Ⅱ级(74.2%),GE组主要为Ⅲ级(64.3%)。与GE组比较,GIE组术后并未延迟首次化疗时间(P>0.05),手术时间延长(0.35±0.13)h(P=0.01)。结论调节型双通道间置空肠消化道重建在近端胃次全切除术中是安全、可行的,有利于防止癌细胞残留和改善近端胃癌根治术后患者生活质量。Objective To explore the optimal technique for digestive tract reconstruction of proximal gastrectomy. Methods Fifty-nine patients who underwent proximal subtotal gastrectomy during June 2004 and January 2007 were analyzed retrospectively. All patients were divided into 2 groups according to the styles of reconstruction: one group with gastroesophagostomy (GE group) and the other with accommodation double tract digestive reconstruction of jejunal interposition (GIE group). The reconstruction of GIE group was to interposite a continuous 35 cm jejunum between the gastric stump and the oesophagus, which detail had been reported in our previous literature. The quality of life in 2 groups were evaluated and compared. Results No patient died and there was no anastomotic leakage, dumping syndrome and moderate or severe anemia occurred during perioperative period. There was no significant difference of the following indexes of nutrition between 2 groups 1 month and 6 months after operation: the value of weight, RBC, Hb, AIb, PNI and the indexes versus the preoperative ones (P〉0.05), for the exception of the indexes of RBC (P=0. 006), Hb (P=0. 001) in 1 month after operation versus the preoperative ones. The abdominal and the reflux esophagitis symptoms in GIE group were milder than those in GE group (P〈 0.001). The Visick scoring: most of the GIE group were grade Ⅱ(74. 2%), and grade Ⅲ (64.3%) in the GE group. There was no delay of the first time of adjuvant chemotherapy in GIE group (P〉0.05), and the surgical time was (0.35±0.13) h more than that of GE group (P=0.01). Conclusion The accommodation double tract digestive reconstruction of jejunal interposition for proximal subtotal gastrectomy may be safe and feasible by decreasing residual cancer cells and improving the quality of life of patients with proximal gastric carcinoma who underwent such surgical procedure.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249