检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]广东省口腔医院(南方医科大学附属口腔医院),广东广州510280
出 处:《国际医药卫生导报》2008年第19期13-16,共4页International Medicine and Health Guidance News
摘 要:目的利用Florida探针评价合并糖尿病慢性牙周炎患者牙周非手术治疗的疗效。方法选择合并糖尿病慢性牙周炎患者10例,进行牙周非手术治疗,使用Florida探针检测患者在治疗前和治疗结束后3个月时的牙周探诊深度(PD)和附着丧失(AL)。结果前牙组、后牙组和所有牙组在治疗后PD和AL较治疗前均有改善(P〈0.01),且前牙组牙周袋深度治疗前后的改变较后牙组明显(P〈0.05)。6个位点治疗前后的PD和AL有统计学差异(P〈0.05),而6个位点治疗前后的差值比较则无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。结论慢性牙周炎伴糖尿病患者对牙周非手术治疗具有良好的治疗反应。Florida探针能够较准确、客观地评价牙周状况。Objective Using Florida probe to evaluate the effect of non- surgical treatment on diabetic patients with chronic periodontitis. Methods 10 diabetic patients with chronic periodontitis were chosen, who accepted periodontal non-surgical treatment. Pocket depth (PD) and 3rd attachment loss(AL) of all patients were recorded with Florida probe before and at the month after periodontal non- surgical treatment. 6 sites on each tooth were detected. Results PD and AL were improved significantly at 3rd month after treatment (P〈0.01) Reduction in pocket depth of anterior teeth was more than posterior teeth (P〈0.05) However, the improvement of PD and AL in 6 sites of all teeth had no significant differences (P〉0. 05).Conclusion Periodontal non-surgical treatment has good effects on diabetic patients with chronic periodontitis. Florida probe evaluates periodontal conditions accurately and objectively.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229