检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]上海中医药大学,上海201203 [2]上海中医药大学附属曙光医院,上海201203
出 处:《中国药学杂志》2008年第17期1295-1299,共5页Chinese Pharmaceutical Journal
基 金:国家教育部博士学科专项基金(20060268008);上海市教委重点学科资助项目(J50302)
摘 要:目的考察不同干燥工艺对中药提取物物理性质的影响。方法选用中药水提复方作为模型药物,考察了真空干燥、喷雾干燥、微波干燥及冷冻干燥对调经益母浸膏粉、肾石通浸膏粉及复方板蓝大青浸膏粉物理性质的影响。结果对于中药水提复方,喷雾干燥产物的黏性较小,喷流性好,微波干燥产物的吸湿性最小而真空干燥产物流动性最好。结论干燥工艺由于干燥方式及原理的不同导致了干燥产物物理性质的差异。OBJECTIVE To investigate the influence of different drying technology on physical properties of Chinese herbs extracts.METHODS The influences of vacuum drying,spray drying,microwave drying and freeze drying on Chinese herbs aqueous extracts such as Tiaojingyimu powder,Shenshitong powder and compound Banlandaqing powder were investigated.RESULTS The powder producted by spray drying showed the lowest viscosity and the best fluidization property.The hygroscopicity of the powder by microwave drying was the least and the flowability of that by vacuum drying was the best.CONCLUSION Different drying technology can make the difference of physical properties of Chinese herbs extracts because of the drying way and its principal.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.40