检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吴娅妮[1]
机构地区:[1]上海市第六人民医院金山分院,上海201500
出 处:《辽宁中医杂志》2008年第10期1535-1536,共2页Liaoning Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine
摘 要:目的:观察加味六磨汤治疗返流性胃炎(BRG)的临床疗效。方法:将69例患者随机分组,中药组37例口服加味六磨汤,西药组32例口服奥美拉唑、新纳络。结果:两组治疗后主要症状、体征均明显好转,与治疗前比较差异有显著性(P<0.01);两组在总有效率、胃脘疼痛、呕苦吞酸、胃脘部压痛的显效率差异无显著性(P>0.05);而中药组在腹胀、嗳气、胃脘烧灼感的显效率明显高于西药组,两组相比差异有显著性(P<0.05)。中药组不良反应率5.4%,西药组不良反应率34.4%,两组相比差异有显著性(P<0.01)。结论:加味六磨汤具有较好的抑制胆汁返流的作用,不良反应少,可有效治疗BRG。Objective :To observe the curative effect of Modified Liumo Decoction in treating bile -regurgitational gastritis. Methods: 69 cases were randomly divided into Chinese drug group ( 37 cases) and Western medicine group (32 cases). The former orally took Modifed Liumo Decoction, while the latter omeprazole, moshabili. Results: After the treatment, the main symptoms and signs of two groups recovered evidently. There was a significant difference(P 〈 0. 01 )in comparison with the pretreatment(P 〈 0. 01). While there was no significant difference between two groups in effective rate,effectual rate for epigastralgia,bihous vomiting and acid regurgitation and pressed pain at gastric cavith( P 〉 0. 05 ). The Chinese medicine group was superior to the Western medicine group in the effectual rate of abdominal distention, belching eructation, burning sensation at gastric eavith. There was also a significant difference( P 〈 0. 05). 5.4% of adverse reaction rate for the Chinese medicine group and 34. 4% for theWestem medicine group. There was a significant difference (P 〈 0. 01 ). Conclusion:Modified Liuno Decoction has a little adverse reaction, and restraining the bile regurgitation. It can cure BRG effectively.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15