检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:任志斌[1,2] 童振华[1,2] 金卫东[1,2] 王鹤秋[1,2]
机构地区:[1]浙江省立同德医院 [2]浙江省精神卫生中心
出 处:《精神医学杂志》2008年第5期350-352,共3页Journal of Psychiatry
摘 要:目的评价齐拉西酮与利培酮治疗精神分裂症的疗效和安全性以及与对照组之间的差异。方法应用循证医学方法对符合标准的15项研究进行分析,评价齐拉西酮与与利培酮治疗精神分裂症的有效率、痊愈率以及副作用的差异。结果齐拉西酮组与利培酮治疗精神分裂症的有效率以及痊愈率均没有显著性差异(P>0.05),但是利培酮的副作用,特别是EPS显著高于齐拉西酮(P<0.01)。结论齐拉西酮和利培酮都是治疗精神分裂症良好的药物,但是它们的副作用存在差异。Objective To assess the difference of efficacy and safety between ziprasidone and risperidone in the treatment of schizophrenia . Methods Fifteen studies meeting the criteria were analyzed by based--evidence medicine, the difference in efficacy rate, full remission rate and side effcts were compared. Results No significant differences of effective rate and full remission rate were found between ziprasidone and rispendone. (P〉 0.05)The incidence of side effects, especially EPS was significantly higher in risperidone than that of ziprasione(P〈0.01) 1. Conclusion Both ziprasidone and risperidone are better drugs for treating patients with schizophrenia , but different in side effects.
分 类 号:R749.3[医药卫生—神经病学与精神病学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.56