检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:段文霞[1,2] 朱波[3] 卢静惠[4] 刘锐[5] 杨朝俊[6] 陈放[1]
机构地区:[1]四川大学生命科学学院,成都610064 [2]四川省农业管理干部学院,成都610071 [3]中国科学院成都山地灾害与环境研究所,成都610041 [4]四川大学分析测试中心,成都610064 [5]北京师范大学地理学与遥感科学学院,北京100875 [6]四川省林业厅,成都610081
出 处:《四川环境》2008年第5期57-63,共7页Sichuan Environment
基 金:国家"十五"重大科技攻关项目(2002BA901A15);国家自然科学基金资助项目(40331014)
摘 要:本文以四川彭州为典型案例,采用材积源生物量法和土壤剖面分析方法,对栽植17年的人工柳杉纯林、杉木纯林以及柳杉-杉木混交林的碳聚积效应进行了比较研究。结果表明:柳杉-杉木混交林的生物量和林分碳贮量显著高于相对应的纯林,每公顷混交林的生物量为204 t,比柳杉纯林和杉木纯林增加16.0%和39.3%;每公顷混交林林分碳贮量为102 t,比柳杉纯林和杉木纯林增加16.1%和39.2%,碳聚积效应显著;柳杉-杉木混交林的土壤总孔隙度、毛管孔隙和非毛管孔隙均高于柳杉纯林和杉木纯林,这将有利于扩大土壤大水库,增加土壤保水抗旱的能力。Carbon storage effects in 17- yr-old of Cryptomeria fortunei forest, Cunninghamia lanceolata forest and their mixed forest were compared in Pengzhou County, Sichuan, China, adopting volume-biomass method and soil profile investigation. The results showed that both biomass and forest carbon storage were significantly higher in mixed forest tban in the pore forests. The biomass was 204 t/hectare in the mixed forest, higher than that in tile pure forests of C.fortunei and C. lanceolata forests bv 16. 0% and 39.3%, respectively. Carbon storage was 102 t/hectare in the mixed forest, higher than that in pure forests of C.fortunei and C. lanceolata forest by 16. 1% and 39. 2% respectively. The soil total porosity, soil capillary, porosity and soil non-capillary porosity were higher in the mixed forest than that in the pure forests, which is favor of water conservation and drought-resistance of soil.
分 类 号:X171.1[环境科学与工程—环境科学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7