检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]湖南农业大学科学技术师范学院,湖南长沙410128 [2]湖南农业大学东方科技学院
出 处:《中国校医》2008年第5期548-550,共3页Chinese Journal of School Doctor
基 金:湖南省教育科学"十一五"规划项目(XJK06BDY009);湖南省社会科学基金项目(06B09);湖南农业大学青年科学基金项目(06QN33)
摘 要:目的探查不同类型高校大学生应对方式之间的差别。方法采用应对方式对来自湖南省十所全日制高校的1 206名大学生进行了问卷调查。结果大学生应对方式的自责、求助、幻想、退避和合理化维度的学校类型主效应显著,一本大学生的积极应对方式多于其他类型高校的大学生,消极应对方式少于其他高校类型的大学生;大学生应对方式的求助和幻想维度的性别主效应显著,女生的求助与幻想行为均多于男生;大学生应对方式在自责、退避、合理化、幻想维度年级主效应显著,低年级大学生较高年级大学生较少地采用这些消极应对方式。结论高校类型、性别与年级对大学生主观幸福感均产生影响。Objective To examine the differences of the coping style among college students from different types of universities. Methods The Chinese version of coping style questionnaire was used to investigate 1 206 college students from 10 different universities in Hunan Province. Results There were significantly differences among the students from the different types of universities in self-blaming, help seeking, illusion, escaping and rationalization. The students from the first type of universities took more positive coping style and less negative coping style than the students from other types of universities. There were also significant differences in help seeking and illusion between genders. Female students took more help seeking and illusion than male students. There were still significant differences in selfblaming, escaping, rationalization and illusion among the students from different grades. The students from lower grade took less negative coping style than the students from higher grades. Conclusions The coping style of college students is affected by the type of universities, gender and grade.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222