运用新怨恨理论进行选题的原由与方法论  

Reasons and Methodology for Taking Theory of New Resentment as a Topic

作　　者：王明科[1] 王金花[2] 

机构地区：[1]江西师范大学文学院当代形态文艺学研究中心,江西南昌330022 [2]南昌理工学院经济管理系,江西南昌330022

出　　处：《廊坊师范学院学报（社会科学版）》2008年第5期6-10,共5页Journal of Langfang Normal University(Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：江西省高校人文社会科学青年基金项目"中国现代诗歌怨恨体验之研究"(WX0705)阶段性成果

摘　　要：运用新怨恨理论研究中国现代文学的怨恨体验,从方法论意义上要解决的问题首先表现在为解决"最典型的怨恨者"与"最有影响的代表者"两难之间的矛盾,选取一部分最典型的怨恨者,同时又选择一部分对中国现代文学的最有影响者。其次,要质疑本质决定论,因为本质往往是先验的、预设的,而现象才是具体的、真实的;本质自己不能显示与证明自己,只有现象才能显示一定的本质。本质不是自明的、自定的、注定的与天生的,而是从现象中产生的,不同的现象表现了不同的本质。再次,要打破思潮流派论,因为思潮流派论无视同一思潮流派的作家,其具体文本有时其实具有极大的不同,相反,倒是不同思潮流派的作家,其具体文本有时并非没有很大相通。最后,要革新包含与被包含的分类方法,借鉴佛教文化的分类思维,不按同一标准而是按照双重或多重标准,不按并列与割裂标准而是按照重复与交叉标准。Methodologically speaking, there are some problems of using the theory of new resentment to study experiences of resentment in Chinese modem literature： the first one lies in solving the contradiction between “the most typical complainers” and “the most influential representatives”, which means to select those who are at once the most typical and the most influential; Secondly, the idea of the determinism of essence should be questioned. As we know, essence is a sort of presupposition while phenomenon is concrete and real and essence can be revealed only through phenomenon. Essence, instead of being self-manifest, self-determinate and naturally-born, derives from phenomenon. Different phenomenon shows different essence. Thirdly, the division of different schools should be blurred. It is natural for writers of a certain school to show differences from each other and vice versa. Lastly, the method of traditional categorization should be reformed. Based on Buddhist ideas of categorization, double or multiple standards , instead of a single standard, should be set up and the standard of repetition and interdisciplinary studies, instead of the one of juxtaposition and division, be taken.

关 键 词：怨恨 选题 方法 

分 类 号：I0[文学—文学理论]