指纹和DNA分型证据的比较研究  

Science Studies on Fingerprinting and DNA Typing

作　　者：王冕[1] 

机构地区：[1]麻省理工学院

出　　处：《河南省政法管理干部学院学报》2008年第6期187-192,共6页Journal of Henan Administrative Institute of Politics and Law

摘　　要：本文在简要地追述了指纹证据和DNA的历史的基础上,介绍了两个法庭证据在技术上的运用并讨论了两个领域相关专业知识的界限和构成。指纹证据拥有独特的说服力来让陪审员定被告的罪。DNA分型研究渗入了主流媒体,尽管它可以明显地辨认嫌疑犯,但DNA分型研究的证据性还是在法庭上遭到质疑。Fingerprint evidence is uniquely powerful in convincing the jury of a defendant＇ s guilt. DNA typing has also infiltrated mainstream television, but despite its apparently sure claim to correctly identify offenders, evidence produced by DNA typing is highly contested in court. This paper will set forth a comparison study of fingerprint evidence and DNA typing evidence. Emerging from the comparison of fingerprinting and DNA typing is the observation that the latter has served as a mirror to reflect the shortcomings of fingerprinting to its practitioners,judges,and lawyers and thus,has had a positive effect on fingerprinting.

关 键 词：指纹 DNA分型研究 比较分析 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]